Smart Investing
-
The Chinese calendar says this is the year of the dragon. Less auspicious perhaps but for Australian investors this is shaping up as the year of fixed income.
-
By taking a few simple steps, super fund members can both boost their retirement savings and legally minimise tax on their super – for themselves and their beneficiaries.
-
Self-managed super funds seem set to remain by far the preferred superannuation choice among higher-balance members – particularly those in retirement.
-
This is a question that many investors are, not surprisingly, asking themselves. But what might surprise some investors is that the answer is not as elusive as it may at first seem.
-
Changes to the ASX operating rules to allow fixed income Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) to trade on the Australian market will open a new means for investors to efficiently, conveniently and inexpensively diversify their investment portfolios.
-
- Podcasts
News & Commentary
The growing majority of cost-conscious investors 31 May 10
Australian investors are likely to place an increasingly high priority on keeping funds management costs to a minimum.
This is largely reflecting the widening recognition that high fees can significantly reduce an investor’s long-term returns.
Among other factors is that when long-term returns are more subdued and short-term markets are more volatile, investors tend to focus more on fees when selecting managed funds.
Fascinatingly, a study published this month by Vanguard in the US – Costs Matter: Are Investors Voting With Their Feet? – measures the popularity of lower-cost funds among American investors.
Vanguard examined Morningstar fund research data showing the net inflow into equity and bond funds over the 10 years to December 2009. The study included, of course, a close examination of the inflows into low-cost Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and conventional index funds as well as into actively managed funds.
In short, the study found that funds with lower-expense ratios received the “lion’s share of investor dollars over the period”, write its authors Francis Kinniry, Donald Bennyhoff and Yan Zilbering.
“… many investors are likely recognising that lower costs help them to keep more of a fund’s returns – [and] have been ‘voting with their feet’ and gravitating to low-cost investment options,” the authors conclude.
The study’s key findings include:
- Equity funds in the lowest expense quartile had a net asset inflow of almost $US395 billion over the decade – representing 86% o the net asset inflows to equity funds in the quartiles with net positive inflows.
- Equity funds in the top two quartiles in terms of expenses suffered net cash outflows of $81 billion.
- ETFs and conventional index funds captured 80% o the net inflow to equity funds tagged the “lowest of the low” in fee terms.
This Vanguard study carries other crucial revelations regarding low-cost funds which Smart Investing will discuss in coming weeks.
* Written by Robin Bowerman, Head of Retail at Vanguard Investments Australia.
To receive this column by email each week, register with Smart Investing.
What can I do next?
- See Prices & Performance data for Vanguard funds
- Learn more about our Managed Funds up to $500,000
- Lean about our Managed Funds over $500,000
- Discover our Exchange Traded Funds
- Order or download a 2009 Index Chart
- Contact Client Services
