News & Commentary

Mission impossible 19 Mar 10

The powerful rebound in the sharemarket from the depths of the GFC provides a compelling lesson about the high cost of market timing.

Market timing – that is, trying to pick the best times to buy or sell shares – only succeeds on a few rare occasions if an investor is extremely lucky. And consistent success from market timing is virtually a mission impossible.

Veteran superannuation researcher Warren Chant, principal of Chant West, tracks the perils of market timing in an excellent newsletter this week headed Staying the Course Pays Off.

Chant answers a question that many investors would have been asking themselves over the past year or so: What would be the consequences if I had switched to an all-cash portfolio during the GFC?

'During the GFC, some [super fund] members despaired of seeing their account balances fall and switched out of growth options into cash,' he writes.

'While that decision was understandable at the time,' he adds, 'it''s probably something they are regretting now because what they did was to lock in their losses and give themselves the added problem of when to get back into growth assets.'

Chant''s calculations for this newsletter are based on the median return of what he classifies as a superannuation 'growth' fund with 61-80% o its portfolio in growth assets. (This is the default option for most members and, significantly, some other researchers classify it as a 'balanced' fund.)

Chant West has produced a table showing that:

  • The only investors or fund members who benefited from switching to cash from a median growth fund had switched prior to October 2008 'before the full brunt' of the Lehman Brothers'' collapse was first felt. (It is assumed for the calculations that such a fund member is still invested in an all-cash portfolio.)
  • A fund member who switched to cash on October 31, 2008 from the median growth portfolio would have had a negative 16.2% rturn for the 28 months to February 28, 2010. (This takes into account the return from an all-cash portfolio after the switch. And again it is assumed that the member still has an all-cash portfolio.)

But fund members who stayed in the median growth fund throughout, their return for the same period would a negative 12.6%. his is much better than a negative 16.2%! br />
'The reality is that most of the people who did switch [to cash] left it too late,' Chant writes. 'Not only did they bear the worst of the negative returns, they also missed out on the best of the positive returns when markets turned up.'

The most testing investment experiences typically provide invaluable lessons. This has been one.

 

* Written by Robin Bowerman, Head of Retail at Vanguard Investments Australia.
To receive this column by email each week, register with Smart Investing.



What can I do next?


Bookmark and Share
GENERAL ADVICE WARNING

Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd (ABN 72 072 881 086 / AFS Licence 227263 / RSE Licence L0001335) is the product issuer. We have not taken yours and your clients' circumstances into account when preparing our website content so it may not be applicable to the particular situation you are considering. You should consider yours and your clients' circumstances and our Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) or Prospectus before making any investment decision. You can access our PDS or Prospectus online or by calling us. This website was prepared in good faith and we accept no liability for any errors or omissions. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

We are the trustee of: Vanguard® Personal Superannuation Plan ABN 81 550 468 553.

© 2012 Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd. All rights reserved. "Vanguard", "Vanguard Investments", "LifeStrategy" and the ship logo are the trademarks of The Vanguard Group, Inc.